garote: (Default)
[personal profile] garote
I saw this question once, on a test from MENSA:
Which one is most different: A, F, N, H, E
It was a multiple choice question. Apparently there was one correct answer, and four that were wrong.
I considered each letter in turn for a couple seconds:
  • A, because it’s the only letter that creates an enclosed space
  • F, because it’s the only letter that doesn’t have symmetry
  • N, because it’s the only letter that can be drawn in one stroke
  • H, because it’s the only letter with symmetry on both axis
  • E, because it’s the made up of four lines (all the others use three)
This question neatly encapsulates everything that I think is wrong with using a standardized test to judge ""intelligence"". Regular tests are all about recalling a fact, or applying a procedure to arrive at a solution. But an ""intelligence"" test is supposedly designed to test precision and cleverness, and be as independent of cultural bias as possible. Instead, every ""intelligence"" test I've come across has been an exercise in divining which approach, among many, the entity scoring the test expects you to use. Which can easily become a matter of cultural bias.

What is the point of questions like this? Of tests like this?

Date: 2007-08-16 05:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegoodreverend.livejournal.com
I've never taken the MENSA test, but I've aced plenty of standardized tests in my day - I'm just GOOD at them. It's certainly not the only way, or perhaps the "best" way to measure intelligence, but it is one way, and I think it's best seen that like that.

That said, MENSA and other test designers are usually very careful about questions that are as clearly ambiguous as your example. Some are bound to slip through, but then again, standardized tests often have 50-200 questions, so no single one makes or breaks the results. Standardized testing as a sole means evaluation is wrong, and unfortunately the case in some locations. But in some situations, it's really the only good choice.

As for MENSA, I can take it or leave it - so far I've not joined because it's primarily a social club, and my social card is full with other activities and groups that feature people like me - just like most people enjoy. That's all MENSA is. My Atheist group requires atheism as a condition for membership, most LUGs require some computer expertise or desire to learn, and MENSA requires a test. No problems there.

No.

Date: 2007-08-16 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-zeugma416.livejournal.com
Your latter point is manifestly wrong. MENSA is not just like any other club or belief group. While the club has a perfect right to exist, you must recognize that MENSA is elitist to the core. It's not like this is a club for people merely interested in logic puzzles or who have professed a belief of some sort -- this is a club for people who have achieved at least a certain high score on a certain exclusive exam, and if you don't make that score, you're out. The idea is to screen out people who are perceived to have less ability and intelligence. If THAT isn't elitist, I don't know what is.

MENSA is a club on the same model as those financially exclusive clubs that are technically open to all but which have enormous annual dues -- the kind of thing that only somebody with a fat income can afford.

Again, I'm not questioning the right of such exclusive clubs to exist -- I'm objecting to this notion that MENSA is "just like" either of the examples you gave, or indeed is "just like" most clubs, which are based on nothing more than a common interest in a given subject or activity. The elitist nature of MENSA has to be recognized.

Re: No.

Date: 2007-08-16 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegoodreverend.livejournal.com
The elitist nature of MENSA has to be recognized

Why? Who cares? If you polled 100 Joes on the street, I'd bet less than 20% have even HEARD of MENSA. From what I can tell, it doesn't do politics at all outside its interest groups. It doesn't lobby. It's a private group, like thousands of others. MENSA's influence seems minimal, at best.

You're also grossly mistaken about MENSA requiring "a certain exclusive exam" - they'll take the results of dozens of different tests, given by dozens of different organizations. Sure, it's "exclusive", just like any group with membership requirements. If you don't like it, don't join. Not sure who they're hurting here...

To clarify:

Date: 2007-08-17 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-zeugma416.livejournal.com
My objection was to your characterization of MENSA as being "just like" the examples you mentioned, and to nothing else. Political influence is a non-issue, and I'm not sure why you've brought it up in response. MENSA more resembles a country-club type of organization than (say) a beer-brewing group or a congregation. To equate the former type of organization with the latter two is to miss an important distinction. That is my single point. Whether they do good or ill is nothing to the purpose. I stand well corrected on the testing issue, but the error hardly invalidates the point.

And incidentally,

Date: 2007-08-17 01:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-zeugma416.livejournal.com
My assumption that they gave a single test came from your opening sentence, "I've never taken the MENSA test."

Profile

garote: (Default)
garote

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 10:46 am