peristaltor: (Default)
peristaltor ([personal profile] peristaltor) wrote in [personal profile] garote 2020-09-16 12:30 am (UTC)

Don't get me wrong: I'm not defending faxes. The level of investment in actual paper in the legal and medical professions, though, should never be underestimated.

There's absolutely no good reason to trust a FAX machine's ability to confirm receipt any better than a mail server's.

And here the key difference between email and fax rises to the surface: the email only exists on paper after it is printed, and many aspects normal to emails (sound, animation) won't print.

One tech embraces print; the other does not. When a doc has to sit in a file box for decades without significant degradation, that must be considered.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting