A great point. But there is more: people consciously filter out the information they don't like. This goes all the way from the press to the individual. Let me give you a few examples:
Bing had an election coverage page, where it published among the other things a selection of 3 polls (I'm not sure if they did the selection or piched it from Huffington Post). In the last few days the polls started leaning Trump-wise. Every time when two out of three polls would predict Trump, one of them got replaced by another poll that predicted Clinton. This happened multiple times. Near the end _all_ 3 of the original polls predicted Trump but they were replaced with the ones that predicted Clinton.
When the DNC documents turned up on WikiLeaks, the Clinton supporters attacked WikiLeaks for publishing this information. Somehow it didn't occur to them that the right thing to do for documentation of your evil deeds not to turn up on WikiLeaks is to avoid doing the evil deeds. No, instead they attack anyone who had blown the cover and disclosed the evil. The same goes for Comey, it's his job to be impartial, but as soon as he acts slightly impartial rather than full-partisan, he gets attacked.
And even right here you say that the Clinton's e-mail scandal had blown over a year ago. Nope, it will blow over when she is judged and put to prison (and maybe gets out on parole in a couple of years). The best way not to get caught is not to do the bad things, rather than to cover them up.
It's also interesting to note that no matter how hard the Clinton team tried, they couldn't find anything "damning" on Trump at all. At all, period. Nothing. Zip. No, a private talk about pussies doesn't count as such at all, and especially so in the context of the Clinton names.
no subject
Bing had an election coverage page, where it published among the other things a selection of 3 polls (I'm not sure if they did the selection or piched it from Huffington Post). In the last few days the polls started leaning Trump-wise. Every time when two out of three polls would predict Trump, one of them got replaced by another poll that predicted Clinton. This happened multiple times. Near the end _all_ 3 of the original polls predicted Trump but they were replaced with the ones that predicted Clinton.
When the DNC documents turned up on WikiLeaks, the Clinton supporters attacked WikiLeaks for publishing this information. Somehow it didn't occur to them that the right thing to do for documentation of your evil deeds not to turn up on WikiLeaks is to avoid doing the evil deeds. No, instead they attack anyone who had blown the cover and disclosed the evil. The same goes for Comey, it's his job to be impartial, but as soon as he acts slightly impartial rather than full-partisan, he gets attacked.
And even right here you say that the Clinton's e-mail scandal had blown over a year ago. Nope, it will blow over when she is judged and put to prison (and maybe gets out on parole in a couple of years). The best way not to get caught is not to do the bad things, rather than to cover them up.
It's also interesting to note that no matter how hard the Clinton team tried, they couldn't find anything "damning" on Trump at all. At all, period. Nothing. Zip. No, a private talk about pussies doesn't count as such at all, and especially so in the context of the Clinton names.